Let's say you have a warship going into what is a known warzone. Casualties are expected. Every man and woman on the warship is aware of this - and that the warzone is their homeland. Whatever they have made of themselves, they came from the warzone, even if they don't live there any more.
You have two combatants on the warship. They have worked with the warship personnel in the warship's current location for somewhere between three to five years. They are proven combatants. They are trusted colleagues and allies.
You also have two non-combatants on the warship. A man and an infant who are connected with one of the combatants in the warship. Neither is known for any military or physical acumen - the infant is, at most, one year old. We don't see them, but they're presumed to be there.
At the edge of the warzone, the commander of the warship tells the two combatants that they have the option to leave. This is not their fight, it's not their homeland, if they chose to stay behind in their homeland, nobody would fault them. Naturally, the two combatants choose to stay and throw their lot in with the warship, even though they don't have a personal stake in the fight.
My brain says that, by this stage, all non-combatants have long since gotten off the warship. It says that since the commander of the warship only offered the two combatants the option of leaving, the non-combatants were already off the warship when it started its journey. It says that anyone who wasn't bound to this fight was left back when the commander decided they were going into the warzone.
Earth logic? Y/N?
You have two combatants on the warship. They have worked with the warship personnel in the warship's current location for somewhere between three to five years. They are proven combatants. They are trusted colleagues and allies.
You also have two non-combatants on the warship. A man and an infant who are connected with one of the combatants in the warship. Neither is known for any military or physical acumen - the infant is, at most, one year old. We don't see them, but they're presumed to be there.
At the edge of the warzone, the commander of the warship tells the two combatants that they have the option to leave. This is not their fight, it's not their homeland, if they chose to stay behind in their homeland, nobody would fault them. Naturally, the two combatants choose to stay and throw their lot in with the warship, even though they don't have a personal stake in the fight.
My brain says that, by this stage, all non-combatants have long since gotten off the warship. It says that since the commander of the warship only offered the two combatants the option of leaving, the non-combatants were already off the warship when it started its journey. It says that anyone who wasn't bound to this fight was left back when the commander decided they were going into the warzone.
Earth logic? Y/N?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
eg. Teyla always wanted to fight the Wraith, but she kept quiet for the sake of her people until a point where others came along whom she felt had a chance of winning the fight.
While she was childless, this wasn't an issue - she could do as she pleased.
In this light, taking her son to Earth is really quite a selfish act. "I don't want to be separated from my son" vs. "My bloodline must survive."
Whether she's there or not to see her son grow up isn't relevant - in a tent-living community like the Athosians, the lines of privacy would be a lot thinner than those on Earth. And so many children would grow up without their parents due to Wraith cullings, that the community should be more important than the family unit.
And so, in Earth terms, it's unthinkable for a mother to 'abandon' her child. In Pegasus terms, in this situation it would be unthinkable for Teyla not to abandon her child.
no subject
no subject
Teyla and Ronon go to Earth thinking they're going to be coming back. The degree of the fight is unimportant - this is nothing they haven't risked before. It's the fact that "this isn't their fight" that makes Woolsey think they might baulk, not the "dangerous nature of the situation."
So Teyla leaves Torran behind just as she has done every other mission she's gone out on.
But she does leave Torran behind in Pegasus, because to take a Pegasus child into a warzone would be irresponsible. It's like leaving her child in Atlantis when she goes out on a mission: Atlantis is usually a 'safe spot' for Torran - except that in this instance, it's not.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Atlantis knew it was headed for a fight against the Wraith when they headed out of Pegasus.
no subject
no subject
It goes against everything she's fighting for.
Which is why I don't get these "post S5" stories that feature Teyla (and Ronon) stuck on Earth. They'd go back. If nobody else went, they'd still go back and keep fighting. It's not just what they do, it's at the core of their identities.
Although, I also have trouble believing that there'd be any way to keep John from going back to Pegasus short of imprisoning him.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
eg. Teyla always wanted to fight the Wraith, but she kept quiet for the sake of her people until a point where others came along whom she felt had a chance of winning the fight.
While she was childless, this wasn't an issue - she could do as she pleased.
In this light, taking her son to Earth is really quite a selfish act. "I don't want to be separated from my son" vs. "My bloodline must survive."
Whether she's there or not to see her son grow up isn't relevant - in a tent-living community like the Athosians, the lines of privacy would be a lot thinner than those on Earth. And so many children would grow up without their parents due to Wraith cullings, that the community should be more important than the family unit.
And so, in Earth terms, it's unthinkable for a mother to 'abandon' her child. In Pegasus terms, in this situation it would be unthinkable for Teyla not to abandon her child.
no subject
no subject
Teyla and Ronon go to Earth thinking they're going to be coming back. The degree of the fight is unimportant - this is nothing they haven't risked before. It's the fact that "this isn't their fight" that makes Woolsey think they might baulk, not the "dangerous nature of the situation."
So Teyla leaves Torran behind just as she has done every other mission she's gone out on.
But she does leave Torran behind in Pegasus, because to take a Pegasus child into a warzone would be irresponsible. It's like leaving her child in Atlantis when she goes out on a mission: Atlantis is usually a 'safe spot' for Torran - except that in this instance, it's not.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Atlantis knew it was headed for a fight against the Wraith when they headed out of Pegasus.
no subject
no subject
It goes against everything she's fighting for.
Which is why I don't get these "post S5" stories that feature Teyla (and Ronon) stuck on Earth. They'd go back. If nobody else went, they'd still go back and keep fighting. It's not just what they do, it's at the core of their identities.
Although, I also have trouble believing that there'd be any way to keep John from going back to Pegasus short of imprisoning him.