Thursday, August 2nd, 2007 10:07 pm
The second-saddest thing about this whole discussion of race and racism in fandom?

It took someone comparing interracial relationships with bestiality to get any discussion about racism really jumping.

It actually took someone more or less stating (intentional or not) that non-whites are not people, are animal, sub-human, lesser, inferior, and filthy, to make fans who've previously decried and denied any need for race discussions ("I'm white and not racist, so racism isn't my problem") to say, "This is unacceptable."

The saddest thing? I suspect that a lot of fans will completely miss the underlying issue - not the racism itself, but the response to the accusation.

It's not that the D-D mods (and community) are racist. It's not that they used the word 'miscegenation' in ignorance of it's history. It's not even that they used the word to put white person/non-white person pairings alongside human/non-human pairings.

It's the way they responded upon having it pointed out that the term was blatantly racist, or that lumping white/non-white in with human/non-human was insulting:

1. We're not racist!
2. There was no racist intent!
3. We won't change the prompt, because that goes against our principles!
4. The problem is yours, because you're taking our interpretation of the word the wrong way!
I used [livejournal.com profile] nardasarmy's phrasing of the D-D mods' attitude from this post.

Which isn't all that different from most knee-jerk reactions to accusations in fandom. Rather than take a look at themselves, examine their work, examine their mentality, examine their assumptions, most people prefer to point the finger at the person bringing the issue to them. "Not my fault but yours!"

It's easier to point the finger, I'll grant. I've done it before - used offensive terms in innocence, expressed offensive opinions unconsciously - and then told or implied to the person bringing me the issue that it's not my problem but theirs. I've also paused, reconsidered, apologised, and reworded so as not to cause offence where none was intended.

I'll probably point the finger again sometime in the future, self-awareness notwithstanding. But, hopefully, when I fall, there'll be thoughtful people who'll grab me, haul me up and say, "You might want to watch out for that next time" rather than let me stumble, roll their eyes with their friends and sneer, "Oh my god, what an idiot!"

And to the people who pick me up and help dust me off with kindness and consideration, I'll say, "Oh, jeeze, I'm sorry. Thanks for the head's up." And we'll continue on together.

--

Incidentally, for people willing to challenge themselves, their perceptions, and their fandom experience, next week is International Blog About Race Week (IBARW). Details are up over at [livejournal.com profile] oyceter's LJ.
Thursday, August 2nd, 2007 01:02 pm (UTC)
This is why I prefer to stay out of racism in fandom, Christ, we get enough of it in "the real world"
Thursday, August 2nd, 2007 09:37 pm (UTC)
And this is why many people of color prefer to stay out of fandom.
Thursday, August 2nd, 2007 09:58 pm (UTC)
*shrugs* Yeah, but, racism in fandom will always go on, and I'd rather not get myself involved, because I will say something that I may or may not regret later on. A perfect example is the sga fortune cookie community.

Sure, I'll say something in rl, but, fandom is the one place I come to escape.

I'll admit the only fandom I'm staying out of is the Doctor Who fandom, because of the whole Martha vs Rose *eyeroll*
Thursday, August 2nd, 2007 10:38 pm (UTC)
I don't know where my line in dawn, fandom wise, sure, whilst I've voiced my opinion about racism in fandom, I do believe that at the end of the day, it is up that individual what he/she considers "racist" I mean when I read that a white person/non white person was a kink, I just rolled my eyes and said WTF? I mean I don't know about you, but, yeah, as a colored person, I was brought up with the realization of racist people, and throughout school there were the typical racial comments...'til I told my teacher *snerk*

Some people, will never learn, nor will they ever change and there's only so much we can do.

I mean it's like when Roots first aired, back in the 70s, Caucasians (not all) were having a problem with it, because they refused to believe that, that's what their ancestors did *shrugs*

One reason I'm still writing Teyla and John/Teyla fic in spite of the continuing unpopularity of character and pairing is because no-one else does - and I can do something about that.

Ah, but, you seem to forget Teyla was only brought in as "eye candy" *eyeroll* sometime, I cannot help but wonder, had Rachel been older and Torri been younger, would "eye candy" come up? It isn't Rachel's fault, she's attractive. I haven't written in the SGA fandom for a long time, mostly due to lack of bunnies. That's why with iconzing, etc, etc, I'll always continue to iconize Teyla (and Weir *g*)

Another perfect example of racism and ignorance’s was Celebrity Big Brother, here in the UK.
Friday, August 3rd, 2007 06:17 pm (UTC)
I don't know what 'Roots' is

I was only a kid when Roots aired, but I remember it being a huge deal. It was a TV miniseries based on an epic (partly autobiographical) saga beginning with the capture of a young African man who was shipped to America and sold into slavery. It was brutally, heartbreakingly realistic, at least to my young sensibilities.
Thursday, August 2nd, 2007 07:02 pm (UTC)
Good post. I think the reaction of the mods, and by extension some of the members of [livejournal.com profile] daily_deviant (who think removing the tag was unnecessary) highlights what's so ugly about how fandom deals with race, and further emphasizes how not talking about race isn't helping matters. Ignoring racism in fandom isn't conducive to FoCs and anti-racist allies having a positive fannish experience and it's appalling that so many fans are OK with basking in their own squee at the discomfort of others.
Thursday, August 2nd, 2007 08:49 pm (UTC)
Great post, especially this: "Which isn't all that different from most knee-jerk reactions to accusations in fandom. Rather than take a look at themselves, examine their work, examine their mentality, examine their assumptions, most people prefer to point the finger at the person bringing the issue to them. "Not my fault but yours!"





Because fandom totally does have really weird issues with race (and gender, and sexuality, etc.) and this is a symptom, not an isolated incident. Nice meta!
Friday, August 3rd, 2007 03:36 am (UTC)
I never really know what to say ... which is why I usually end up not saying anything, or just commenting with an occasional "Word!" to other people's much more eloquent posts. (Like here!) With this situation, I feel as if I really should have posted about it, but I can never think of anything to say that's more useful than "OMGWTF AAAARGH STUPID PEOPLE OVER THERE", which isn't very useful.
Friday, August 3rd, 2007 09:17 am (UTC)
Oh, I know you didn't say that everyone had to comment! What I'd drawn from the first part of your post, though, is that remaining quiet, not commenting on a thing like that, conveys a sort of tacit acceptance of the behavior in question. I thought that was the sort of behavior you were talking about -- not people *saying* "It's not my problem", but people *implying* that it wasn't their problem by going on about their usual fannish activities without speaking up to say "This is wrong." However, reading back, I can see that you didn't really say this at all; it wouldn't be the first time I've jumped to conclusions based on what I *thought* I read rather than what was actually there...

Anyway, I was actually agreeing with what I'd thought you wrote ... which you didn't ... so, shutting up now. *g*
Saturday, August 4th, 2007 06:19 pm (UTC)
OMGWTF AAAARGH STUPID PEOPLE OVER THERE can be helpful though. I am morally certain the d_d community and mods changed their tag use mostly because of the volume of protest, and not because so many of them changed their minds about what they did.

I'm not saying you were wrong to be quiet, I'm just saying that pointing people to a situation and pointing out that the situation is bad has utility.
Saturday, August 4th, 2007 07:08 pm (UTC)
Oh, I think you're absolutely right about that -- in this specific situation and also in general. It's just that when it comes to actually making those sorts of posts, I feel as if I should go on and get thinky about it, and often don't feel up to it, and then end up being quiet when I felt that I shouldn't have. If that makes any sense at all. But, yeah, I agree.
Friday, August 3rd, 2007 06:01 pm (UTC)
I generally just stay out of it. I can't get in trouble and I can't offend anyone if I just keep my mouth shut, because with my luck I'll say something that someone else will think is offensive.

It's too easy to offend anyone these days, no matter how right or wrong a comment it is. I prefer to just stay out of it and live in my own happy little bubble where there's candy canes and everybody gets along.
Saturday, August 4th, 2007 02:19 pm (UTC)
You know before you brought up John/Teyla in this it never occurred to me that the reason the pairing wasn't too popular was because of colour. I loved the paring since the first episode. I saw it then and I see it in season 3 and from the one clip of season 4 and spoilers of season 4 I'm sure I'll see it in season 4. Maybe I'm just blind that I didn't see it before you brought it up.
Monday, August 6th, 2007 06:10 pm (UTC)
I don't join in these discussions, mainly because other people tend to say what I'm thinking so much better than I could, but I do follow the links. I find some of these discussions interesting, illuminating and informative.
Wednesday, August 15th, 2007 01:36 am (UTC)
Hmm, I go away for a few weeks and I totally miss out on the latest kerfuffle (someone else used the word earlier, and I must say I like it :D). Not that I mind - I tend to back away these days when the hackles start going up. But nevertheless, how did this all start?