I understand the principle of the thing:
het: male/female relationship
slash: male/male relationship (sometimes term includes female/female relationship)
femmeslash: female/female relationship
gen: no relationship
However, actually defining a given story in terms of the relationships within it seems...limiting. Especially when the story isn't focused on a specific relational outcome.
I once read a story that was labelled with about six or seven different pairings - and yet there wasn't really anything in there that I'd even class as UST. It was just interactions. Maybe it's just a function of fandom - where the most popular pairings are those characters that interact the most (anyone familiar with the Harry Potter fandom and the Harry/Hermione vs Harry/Ginny phenomenon?), but have we really fallen so far that we're reduced to what I see as a mentality of "They looked at/spoke to each other! It must be love!"?
Then there's some confusion about what 'gen' actually means. Back in the mists of time, 'gen' meant non-slash, and everything het below an R-rating. These days - at least in Stargate fandom, it seems as though 'gen' is defined as "something we would see in the show" - which is always difficult since different people see different things in the show.
( rubber hits the road: practical examples )
How do you perceive the genre labels and their accuracy in defining stories and character relationships?
het: male/female relationship
slash: male/male relationship (sometimes term includes female/female relationship)
femmeslash: female/female relationship
gen: no relationship
However, actually defining a given story in terms of the relationships within it seems...limiting. Especially when the story isn't focused on a specific relational outcome.
I once read a story that was labelled with about six or seven different pairings - and yet there wasn't really anything in there that I'd even class as UST. It was just interactions. Maybe it's just a function of fandom - where the most popular pairings are those characters that interact the most (anyone familiar with the Harry Potter fandom and the Harry/Hermione vs Harry/Ginny phenomenon?), but have we really fallen so far that we're reduced to what I see as a mentality of "They looked at/spoke to each other! It must be love!"?
Then there's some confusion about what 'gen' actually means. Back in the mists of time, 'gen' meant non-slash, and everything het below an R-rating. These days - at least in Stargate fandom, it seems as though 'gen' is defined as "something we would see in the show" - which is always difficult since different people see different things in the show.
( rubber hits the road: practical examples )
How do you perceive the genre labels and their accuracy in defining stories and character relationships?
Tags: