For a retconning that doesn't have to be a retcon if people think outside the box...
spoilers for S5: Search And Rescue!
Upon meeting the Atlantis expedition, Teyla introduces herself as "Teyla, daughter of Tegan".
However, we are never told which parent Tegan is.
Teyla's father is repeatedly mentioned, but he is never referred to by his name. No-one - not Charin, not Halling, not Teyla herself - says "Tegan, father of Teyla".
So, yes, it is entirely possible that Teyla's father's name is Torran, and her mother's name is Tegan. It is entirely possible that, while her father was the leader of the Athosians, and Teyla is his daughter, the Athosians count their generations through the mother. Or, it's possible that a child counts her or his bloodline through the parent of the same sex.
For a culture where a family unit as the western world understands it may not exist (a community culture that lives in tents and apparently holds work in common - the tava planting mentioned in Return I?) it may be easier to count generations through the mother rather than the father - especially if the father is the man who raises the child, not necessarily the sire.
Not every culture in the Stargate universe need be as patriarchal as Earth.
Regarding whether it was intentional or a mistake: knowing TPTB, it was probably a mistake. However, they're lucky that, amidst all the mentions of Teyla's father, no-one ever named him.
I believe we can take it as canon now that Torran is the father of Teyla, and Tegan is the mother of Teyla.
Feel free to refer anyone and everyone to this post, because I just know it's going to come up again.
spoilers for S5: Search And Rescue!
Upon meeting the Atlantis expedition, Teyla introduces herself as "Teyla, daughter of Tegan".
However, we are never told which parent Tegan is.
Teyla's father is repeatedly mentioned, but he is never referred to by his name. No-one - not Charin, not Halling, not Teyla herself - says "Tegan, father of Teyla".
So, yes, it is entirely possible that Teyla's father's name is Torran, and her mother's name is Tegan. It is entirely possible that, while her father was the leader of the Athosians, and Teyla is his daughter, the Athosians count their generations through the mother. Or, it's possible that a child counts her or his bloodline through the parent of the same sex.
For a culture where a family unit as the western world understands it may not exist (a community culture that lives in tents and apparently holds work in common - the tava planting mentioned in Return I?) it may be easier to count generations through the mother rather than the father - especially if the father is the man who raises the child, not necessarily the sire.
Not every culture in the Stargate universe need be as patriarchal as Earth.
Regarding whether it was intentional or a mistake: knowing TPTB, it was probably a mistake. However, they're lucky that, amidst all the mentions of Teyla's father, no-one ever named him.
I believe we can take it as canon now that Torran is the father of Teyla, and Tegan is the mother of Teyla.
Feel free to refer anyone and everyone to this post, because I just know it's going to come up again.
Tags:
no subject
It's not uncommon for women to be close to their fathers; I was. Not that my mother wasn't an influence but there were things that I learned from my father that I feel resonate with me now.
One thing: you could look at Teyla as having spent periods of apprenticeship (for lack of a better term) with significant people in her life. Trading skills with her father, leadership skills with her mother and Charin acting as another adult mentor. All of which would work in a society that has no guarantees that your parents or other family members will always be with you.
What is probably TPTB's mistake could be a win for us as fans.
no subject
no subject
and it reminded me of a saying from another culture here on Earth: "I hope that my wife's brother raises my children as well as I raise my sister's children." ...or something to that effect.
no subject
The men are the leaders, but their heir cannot be from their own sons, but must be chosen from their sisters' sons. It was an interesting balancing of the traditional patriarchal vs. matriarchal culture.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I think it's safe to say that the family unit as the western world understands it is pretty much guaranteed not to exist for a great many people in Pegasus, what with all the cullings. You'd end up with a pretty disfunctional society if you insisted upon clinging to the husband-wife-children = basic-unit-of-society model, what with any individual or combination of individuals getting eaten without notice.
And about the premier: I finally broke down and went to watch it on YouTube. While I was watching part 3 (of 5), they took the rest down for copyright violation! Ack! Only getting to see half of it was worse than not getting to see it at all! *sigh* Is it July yet?
no subject
Way too soon for my state of mind! *hugs*
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I did wonder about that in my initial reaciton post: whether Torran would be 'Torran son of Teyla' or 'Torran son of Kanaan'.
no subject
it takes a village to raise a child. this concept must run rampant throught pegasus with all the cullings.
no subject
One would think so in Pegasus.
no subject
Whether or not the writers screwed up, Teyla doesn't say which it is. And the way she introduces herself as 'Daughter of Tagaan' is ceremonial, and not very much like the way she speaks of her father at all. It seems to me that if we're looking for consistency, that should be a factor. Perhaps they're like the Genii, in that they used to have a much more rich society and it's softened and altered over the years so that Halling can lead them without it being totally against their ways.
IMO, Teyla's mother was regal and untouchable and to be respected, but her father and Charin were the ones that treated her like their child. When introducing yourself as a leader of your people to newcomers, you don't convey 'Hey, so, I'm the daughter of this person whose name clearly means something to me, but, I'm not so much thinking of this person with as much love and respect as I feel for the father I lost along the way.'
I look at it two ways:
1) The writers might be, as some suggest, not so strong with their own canon. We can ask and receive a definitive answer about this (I asked at Joe M's blog yesterday, actually) and find out one way or another, or we can decide they simply screwed up and behave accordingly (ie. lose respect for them, not care in the slightest, defend them, whatever).
2) In the context of the show. Because, here's the thing. WHETHER OR NOT the writers screwed up, both names are canon now. So, for accurate fic writing and peace of mind, we've got to reconcile it anyway. We can either handwave it in fic or come up with a logical, rational explanation and personally I like the latter a lot more than the former. I hate handwaving, and this really does strike me as quite the logical explanation for the name discrepancy, whether or not it's a fuckup.
no subject
Another alternative to Teyla's apparent distance from her mother is that her mother died while Teyla was too young to remember her.
I hate handwaving, and this really does strike me as quite the logical explanation for the name discrepancy, whether or not it's a fuckup.
Exactly my thoughts.
Another interesting angle is that Tegan is not an actual parent but a lineage link. Some cultures don't count the parent so much as the lineage. "Teyla, daughter of Tegan" might very well be Athosian code for "Teyla, of Tegan's line".
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
So it makes a certain amount of sense to assume that the Athosians over the generations might have developed the cultural habit of defining their lineage through the mother, simply because it was sure that the child was hers while the dad - *if* there was one - was perhaps often not the biological father.
Just an idea. :-)
no subject
no subject
I'd honestly rather work with your answer than try to make excuses for a writing team that publicly admits it has no character bibles. I mean, it's a wonder something like this is only just happening now, instead of years ago.
no subject
Of course, TPTB aren't going to actually formulate any of this. And I heard about the lack of character guides. Which probably goes a long way to explain why they're not all that consistent as far as characterisation goes. :/
Sometimes it seems like Stargate is a very haphazardly-written show.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's not uncommon for women to be close to their fathers; I was. Not that my mother wasn't an influence but there were things that I learned from my father that I feel resonate with me now.
One thing: you could look at Teyla as having spent periods of apprenticeship (for lack of a better term) with significant people in her life. Trading skills with her father, leadership skills with her mother and Charin acting as another adult mentor. All of which would work in a society that has no guarantees that your parents or other family members will always be with you.
What is probably TPTB's mistake could be a win for us as fans.
no subject
no subject
and it reminded me of a saying from another culture here on Earth: "I hope that my wife's brother raises my children as well as I raise my sister's children." ...or something to that effect.
no subject
The men are the leaders, but their heir cannot be from their own sons, but must be chosen from their sisters' sons. It was an interesting balancing of the traditional patriarchal vs. matriarchal culture.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I think it's safe to say that the family unit as the western world understands it is pretty much guaranteed not to exist for a great many people in Pegasus, what with all the cullings. You'd end up with a pretty disfunctional society if you insisted upon clinging to the husband-wife-children = basic-unit-of-society model, what with any individual or combination of individuals getting eaten without notice.
And about the premier: I finally broke down and went to watch it on YouTube. While I was watching part 3 (of 5), they took the rest down for copyright violation! Ack! Only getting to see half of it was worse than not getting to see it at all! *sigh* Is it July yet?
no subject
Way too soon for my state of mind! *hugs*
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I did wonder about that in my initial reaciton post: whether Torran would be 'Torran son of Teyla' or 'Torran son of Kanaan'.
no subject
it takes a village to raise a child. this concept must run rampant throught pegasus with all the cullings.
no subject
One would think so in Pegasus.
no subject
Whether or not the writers screwed up, Teyla doesn't say which it is. And the way she introduces herself as 'Daughter of Tagaan' is ceremonial, and not very much like the way she speaks of her father at all. It seems to me that if we're looking for consistency, that should be a factor. Perhaps they're like the Genii, in that they used to have a much more rich society and it's softened and altered over the years so that Halling can lead them without it being totally against their ways.
IMO, Teyla's mother was regal and untouchable and to be respected, but her father and Charin were the ones that treated her like their child. When introducing yourself as a leader of your people to newcomers, you don't convey 'Hey, so, I'm the daughter of this person whose name clearly means something to me, but, I'm not so much thinking of this person with as much love and respect as I feel for the father I lost along the way.'
I look at it two ways:
1) The writers might be, as some suggest, not so strong with their own canon. We can ask and receive a definitive answer about this (I asked at Joe M's blog yesterday, actually) and find out one way or another, or we can decide they simply screwed up and behave accordingly (ie. lose respect for them, not care in the slightest, defend them, whatever).
2) In the context of the show. Because, here's the thing. WHETHER OR NOT the writers screwed up, both names are canon now. So, for accurate fic writing and peace of mind, we've got to reconcile it anyway. We can either handwave it in fic or come up with a logical, rational explanation and personally I like the latter a lot more than the former. I hate handwaving, and this really does strike me as quite the logical explanation for the name discrepancy, whether or not it's a fuckup.
no subject
Another alternative to Teyla's apparent distance from her mother is that her mother died while Teyla was too young to remember her.
I hate handwaving, and this really does strike me as quite the logical explanation for the name discrepancy, whether or not it's a fuckup.
Exactly my thoughts.
Another interesting angle is that Tegan is not an actual parent but a lineage link. Some cultures don't count the parent so much as the lineage. "Teyla, daughter of Tegan" might very well be Athosian code for "Teyla, of Tegan's line".
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
So it makes a certain amount of sense to assume that the Athosians over the generations might have developed the cultural habit of defining their lineage through the mother, simply because it was sure that the child was hers while the dad - *if* there was one - was perhaps often not the biological father.
Just an idea. :-)
no subject
no subject
I'd honestly rather work with your answer than try to make excuses for a writing team that publicly admits it has no character bibles. I mean, it's a wonder something like this is only just happening now, instead of years ago.
no subject
Of course, TPTB aren't going to actually formulate any of this. And I heard about the lack of character guides. Which probably goes a long way to explain why they're not all that consistent as far as characterisation goes. :/
Sometimes it seems like Stargate is a very haphazardly-written show.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
We can take whatever we want as canon, because both opportunities have been presented.
In "Duet", Rodney's name is CLEARLY "Rodney Ingram McKay". In "McKay and Mrs. Miller", it suddenly becomes "Meredith Rodney McKay".
You can talk anthropology all you want, and you'll be right (and I've done it too), but that does not excuse lazy writing.
Perhaps we should send them a flow chart? :)
no subject
The question of who Tagan is has never been answered in canon. It might be her mother, it might be her lineage in much the same manner of "Jesus, called Christ, son of David".
I'm sure that it was lazy writing on the part of TPTB, but that doesn't mean that it isn't canon.
The Rodney Ingram vs. Meredith Rodney question is a duality - again, doubtless brought on by lazy writing; this isn't. Her father's name is Torran, and Teyla is a "daughter of Tagan" - whatever that means.
no subject
We can take whatever we want as canon, because both opportunities have been presented.
In "Duet", Rodney's name is CLEARLY "Rodney Ingram McKay". In "McKay and Mrs. Miller", it suddenly becomes "Meredith Rodney McKay".
You can talk anthropology all you want, and you'll be right (and I've done it too), but that does not excuse lazy writing.
Perhaps we should send them a flow chart? :)
no subject
The question of who Tagan is has never been answered in canon. It might be her mother, it might be her lineage in much the same manner of "Jesus, called Christ, son of David".
I'm sure that it was lazy writing on the part of TPTB, but that doesn't mean that it isn't canon.
The Rodney Ingram vs. Meredith Rodney question is a duality - again, doubtless brought on by lazy writing; this isn't. Her father's name is Torran, and Teyla is a "daughter of Tagan" - whatever that means.