Here is the news...

[tielan]

It seems that SGA has been renewed for another season, while SG1 has been cancelled.

All in all, it's not terribly surprising news.

--

For those of you who love the entire series and don't mind a John/Teyla as a pairing - canonically or fanonically, there's finally a community that's general with J/T leanings - atlantislovers. The moderator regularly posts caps of the episodes from week to week with some humourous commentary.

--

And, for those keeping up with the debacle of sga_flashfic's remix challenge (less than 24 hours and it's already on Fandom_Wank - Don't Underestimate The Power Of The Wank!), please do not use any of my stories for the challenge . I'm not planning to enter this challenge (truth be told, I'm relieved it's not one I feel at all drawn to write for) so I won't be taking any of your stories to remix. In return, I ask that you don't remix any of mine.

Comments

[tielan]

Don't ask me how the television executive's mind works - I'm just a lowly fan! :)

It is a big pity for Atlantis that they've cancelled SG-1, especially since they were building the 'gate-bridge' from Pegasus to the Milky Way - it would have given an interesting opportunity for semi-regular crossovers with blends and reblends of the characters in different situations.

Whether TPTB would have taken up those opportunities is another situation entirely.

To be honest, I'd give SGA until the 100th episode, after that, it's all up in the air. Showtime only kept SG1 for five years before putting it up for Skiffy.

[ladysarahjane.livejournal.com]

That's true. We were having quiet a bit of crossovers this season (compared to the past that is) and the gate bridge would have probably blended the two shows together even more.

As for SGA and their 100th episode. Is it just me or is this a growing trend? Most shows seem to be ending once they hit the end of five seasons. It's like their cut off mark or something, no matter what the ratings are.

[tielan]

It may be to do with writing arcs. After five seasons, things start blurring into each other a little and if you're living from season to season (the way most shows have to these days) rather than from an overarching story arc, then you start to encounter the problem of 'only so many stories to be told' and the difficulty of working out how to develop new ones.

Then again, as shown, it's not the writers who determine what shows keep going.

It might just be that TV channels want new shows for new audiences, rebranding and adjusting their 'franchise' as they go along.

[ladysarahjane.livejournal.com]

Most writers are good enough to give new faces to old stories and make them "almost" new again. But like you said it's not the writers that get to determine.

Either I'm getting old or networks are trying to appeal to younger and younger audiences. I'm always hearing all this talk to trying to target the 18-24 group. Which is intreasting because I fall in that group and the networks keep trying to appeal to my age group but I'm just getting turned off.

[tielan]

It might be that they're trying stuff like The OC and Veronica Mars - with "younger, edgier characters" to get the 18-24 group.

[ladysarahjane.livejournal.com]

The funny thing is, at least in my circle of friends, is we're turned off my shows like THE OC and VERONICA MARS. We're more Law & Order, Crossing Jordan, Stargate folk. They have drama yes, but not the OVER crazy soap opera drama that for some reason TV executives think the 18-24 group is attracted to. Overdramatic is overkill.

[tielan]

Unfortunately, the Stereotype knows all and the Stereotype dictates all.

:-/

[ladysarahjane.livejournal.com]

*frowns*