Watching the DW vs Tumblr terminology/functionality discussion makes me feel like I'm at work.
It's like trying to explain why System A does items 1-9, but not item 5 because the architecture simply isn't capable of that. However System B is insisting that it absolutely needs item 5 because they do Thing Alpha and Thing Beta which is the core of their system functionality, but what they call Thing Beta in System B is actually Thing Gamma in System A, because Thing Beta means another set of processes entirely in System A...
I mean, I get that people are attached to the terminology, function, and culture they're used to, but when in Rome, etc., etc.
It's like trying to explain why System A does items 1-9, but not item 5 because the architecture simply isn't capable of that. However System B is insisting that it absolutely needs item 5 because they do Thing Alpha and Thing Beta which is the core of their system functionality, but what they call Thing Beta in System B is actually Thing Gamma in System A, because Thing Beta means another set of processes entirely in System A...
I mean, I get that people are attached to the terminology, function, and culture they're used to, but when in Rome, etc., etc.
no subject
no subject
Like, you're not giving it up; but you have to learn what that term means here, and you have to be prepared for the shitstorm that you've called when you say you're going to 'reblog' something to people who don't play on tumblr and who are fiercely protective of their content - who are here on DW because they are fiercely protective of their content!
Features and bugs, bugs and features...
no subject
(The OTHER fucking annoying thing was "You don't understand how Tumblr works so -- " Bitch I had a Tumblr in 2010. I probably had a Tumblr before most of you did. Miss me with this "you don't know what reblogs are, you old person who cannot handle change and want all the houses on the street to be painted the same colour, that's why you're frightened" utter bullshit.)
no subject
no subject
//FROTH FROTH PANT PANT //DESTROYS CHEWTOY
no subject
I mean, there are things that I'd like to be able to do here - just 'like' a post, for instance. (The number of times I've gone looking for the 'like' butto-- Oh, hang on, it's DW. D'oh!) But the experiences between Tumblr and DW are very different - not just in the way we treat content and attribution, but in the heavy web/code based presence that DW relies on and the feelgood 'just reblog it' culture of Tumblr.
It's going to be a bit of a brain-breaker for the Tumblrites, I suspect.
no subject
I think the very weird thing about the reblogging was that potofsoup person was going on and on about how STRANGE and RUDE they would find it to just "leap in" to a "stranger's" discussion -- but you know, that happened on Tumblr when a friend would reblog something by someone I didn't know and it came across my dash. On Tumblr everything was binary -- public/private, on/off, and people got to know each other with private messages. (You see this on twitter with DMs and group chats, and it's happening again with Discord.) So sending someone you didn't know a private "ask" was OK, but leaving a comment to a post of someone you don't know is OMG WHAT HOW DO. (And because of e-stalkers I consider asks, especially anon asks, a hundred times more intrusive and offputting than comments I can screen or delete and users I can ban if they get abusive. But anyway.)
I gotta admit I loathe like buttons. I loathe them on Facebook, I loathe them on news stories, I loathe them on Twitter and Tumblr and AO3, I hope they never appear here. (People try to recreate them with textbox code and "Kudos" or "I like this" and I'm just like, WHY.) I am a grumpy old bat to be sure.
no subject
And yeah, that thing about leaping into a stranger's discussion seems most exceedingly odd to people who came to LJ/DW from mailing lists and newsgroups and forums/bulletin boards, where everything is just 'leap in and discuss with strangers'.
I guess to a generation accustomed to "my site" and "my tumblr post" and "my FB status", it might seem weird? To us, who were here before there was any kind of site personalisation possible, it's just the way internet conversations happen.
I gotta admit I loathe like buttons
You will loathe them on the beaches, in the trenches, in the fields, and streets, and hills? :)
On one hand, they do make 'interaction' (it's not actually interaction, but we'll call it that) easy. A quick approval, no actual human contact required! But I think it cheats both the person liking and the person liked by eliminating the possibility of any conversation, and not stretching people to actual interact.
Let's be real, I have never made a friend out of someone who merely 'liked' my fic, my tumblr posts, or my FB statuses. I've made friends by talking to strangers (hi there!) on the intarwebs, many of whom I've never met in person and never will meet but with whom I've taken a risk and shared stuff about me, my opinions, and my life that sit out there for people to judge.
no subject
A whole lot of people put effort into some communities, like flash fiction and so on, and then it (utterly predictably) tanked. (I looked at the blog of one of the guys who started it, and he was very very weird.) And the people behind Imzy had a helluva lot more experience and insight than the two or three kids trying to re-invent the wheel at Pillowfort. (Seriously, the main experience of the person who had the idea seems to be that she went to a coding camp.) And then a lot of people got very bitter and wary about putting a lot of effort into a site that was going to fold without warning, and it's hard to blame them.
I guess to a generation accustomed to "my site" and "my tumblr post" and "my FB status", it might seem weird? To us, who were here before there was any kind of site personalisation possible, it's just the way internet conversations happen.
Yeah, and I found Tumblr very strange in that you didn't have a site exactly -- everyone went through their dash, which was sort of like the friends feed on DW, except you didn't go any different places to talk to people; you reblogged or commented or whatever onto your dash, and you also need that xkit tag viewer to see what people might say. So there is this "my dash" space that is a little like "my feed," except I think people typically visit the DW blog to comment. (Even though you can comment now without leaving the feed.)
You will loathe them on the beaches, in the trenches, in the fields, and streets, and hills? :)
I SHALL NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURRENDER -- wait that turned into a weird mashup
But I think it cheats both the person liking and the person liked by eliminating the possibility of any conversation, and not stretching people to actual interact.
Let's be real, I have never made a friend out of someone who merely 'liked' my fic, my tumblr posts, or my FB statuses. I've made friends by talking to strangers (hi there!) on the intarwebs, many of whom I've never met in person and never will meet but with whom I've taken a risk and shared stuff about me, my opinions, and my life that sit out there for people to judge.
YES, and that is precisely exactly why I LOATHE them. It's not real human interaction, it's a cheap substitute, and it's also this kind of high like the lab rat getting a food pellet. -- And yet I'm as guilty as other people of kudosing rather than commenting on AO3. Does FF.net have like buttons? I can't remember....
no subject
(I just went back and rewatched that scene.)
FF.net has the ability to 'favourite'. Which, yes. Lacks interaction.
no subject
I hear people say they get more comments on FF.net, but fewer likes, while AO3 is the opposite.
no subject
no subject
no subject