Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 07:05 am
Because I've had a number of people ask about and for beta-reading in the last four months (I put my name down for a beta-reading program at ff.net - yes, I know), and I think I should set some things straight:

How do I find a beta reader?

a) Find someone whose work you consider at least as good, preferably better than yours,

b) ask them to beta for you.

If they say no, then they say no. Move on to the next candidate. If I can't find someone whose work or perspective I respect in the area, character, or pairing that I'm writing in, I'll choose someone whose work or perspective I respect outside of the area, character, or pairing that I'm writing in.

--

However, I find the important question is not How do I find a beta reader? but How do I keep a good beta reader?

--

How do I keep a good beta reader?

The answer is:

i) don't be 'precious' about your work; if they're better than you and they come up with criticism, listen to what they're saying and seriously think about it,

ii) learn from what they point out to you, don't just implement it and say 'thanks' - think about why they said it in the first place, and remember it the next time you write something,

iii) thank them, often and lots.

One of the best responses I ever got from one of my betas was, "Jack O'Neill would never let this behaviour pass. You have completely raped his character, his honour, his sense of right and wrong. I'm very offended and bitterly disappointed. I expected this from [fans who had a habit of making Jack teh evol/mean for the purposes of their story about their pwecious woobie] but not from you."

It hurt like hell to hear that. But when the red haze cleared, I realised that she was right. Jack's character had been forgotten in my need to 'make the plot work', and my story was the poorer for it. I needed that kick in the pants, and I rewrote that section of the story.

More importantly, I learned from it: a character should never be made subordinate to the needs of the plot - otherwise both plot and character become meaningless.

Sadly, that beta drifted out of fandom a few months later, and I had to hunt up a new one.

--

Will you beta my story?

The short answer: no.

The long answer follows:

I've beta-read for a number of people in my life, few of them more than once.

Mostly, I've found that people who ask me to beta-read for them just want someone to pat them on the head and say "this is a really awesome fic" and not actually offer any criticism. In short, they just want validation - they don't want to improve.

I have set four basic requirements of beta-reading:

1. Do you have a competent grasp of the English language? Will I find myself repeatedly adding or deleting commas and apostrophes, wincing at the change of tense in your story, correcting the spelling of your character names, or writing "I do not think this means what you think it means"? (A little bit of this, fine; too much and I begin to wonder why you're writing at all.)

2. Do you re-read your story through and correct any errors you come across before you send it to me? I rarely send my story off to a beta without reading it through - to the point of obsession - and making sure that she has minimal work to do.

3. Do your characters act like real people, or like fiction tropes? Are they true to their canon depictions in thought, word, and deed and not just filling the Chosen Roles for your Story Trope? Is John Sheppard acting like a military leader, or like a horny teenaged boy? (Unless, of course, John is a horny teenaged boy in the story, in which case, is he still recognisable as John Sheppard?)

4. Are you going to learn from my beta'ing? Am I going to find myself correcting the same mistakes you make the second, third, fourth time through?

#4 is probably the most important requirement. We all start at the beginning; but how fast you learn and improve is up to you. And, just because this is "fun" doesn't mean that it shouldn't be hard work. Hard work can be enjoyable too: and the reward is being good.

--

Why do I need a beta anyway?

Your beta is your lifeline to 'people who aren't you'. They are someone who isn't privy to your thought processes, who is reading your story as a stranger and who can tell you what works and what doesn't, far better than you can judge yourself.

For people new to the internets and writing, I advise against having a friend beta you. Find a stranger, someone who likes your character or pairing, and ask them. Swallow your pills and take your chops, learn, grow, and improve, and the chances are a broader spectrum of people will compliment you on your work.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:16 pm (UTC)
All good points. It's hard work to be a 'good' beta, which is why I'm selective about it. And it's also hard to take that step back from your fic when you send it off.

But yes, treat your beta readers well; I've discovered having one for plot holes/continuity and a second for over-all grammar and flow works best for me. But then I think I'm probably fortunate in that I've had a stable beta for so long (and have found someone who is very good at picking out those plot holes/continuity issues).
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:18 pm (UTC)
See, when I beta, I tend to work most with people who need instruction in basic grammar, because I'm good at explaining not just what's wrong but why it's wrong and how to make it better. And bad grammar bugs me so much that the chance to really rip something apart with red ink (okay, red pixels) can be really satisfying. But #4 is key--that's so important.

Also: [livejournal.com profile] synecdochic has a series of writing meta that's really good. She's got essays on all kinds of things from the structure of fiction in general to mechanics (mood, point of view, show-don't-tell) to characterization to reader expectations to the process of writing and the process of editing--they're great essays, easy to read and understand, and she doesn't fall into the trap of saying "you have to do it the way I do it." Lots of times when there's a big problem in someone's story and that requires a lot of work I can point them in the direction of one of her essays to explain why that's such a huge problem. Saves me a lot of time and effort having to reinvent the wheel.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:30 pm (UTC)
Lots of times when there's a big problem in someone's story and that requires a lot of work I can point them in the direction of one of her essays to explain why that's such a huge problem. Saves me a lot of time and effort having to reinvent the wheel.

Yes, this in particular can be very frustrating - trying to figure out how to instruct someone on how to fix their fic.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:42 pm (UTC)
Yeah. Because I've had stories where there was a major problem and the author was a n00b who knew nothing about writing and had never paid much attention to what she read besides "I like this" or "I don't like this" and so to explain what the problem was and why it was a problem would have taken more words than the story or chapter. But knowing that, would enable them to make their story 1000x better than it was at that moment.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:27 pm (UTC)
Thanks so much for writing this. :)
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 03:40 am (UTC)
I remember.

I started betaing because I figured it would be a way to improve the quality of the stories, particularly on the Ronon/Keller front, since the ship is rather new. I'm not the greatest writer, but I'm feel I'm pretty good at pointing out inconsistencies and recognizing areas where there writer needs to elaborate.

One person who I beta'd for recently told me that I "spoiled" her, because she liked my method. She wrote, "I find myself looking for someone who will offer suggestions and criticism as well as check my punctuation and grammar."

I thought, That's what you should have been looking for in a beta reader all along. Either way, it's cool she sees the difference now. You're supposed to want someone who is going to push you to be a better writer. If not, there's no point in writing at all.

I mean, yes, part of it is writing stories that are fun and enjoyable. But I personally want to read stories that stay with me, ones whose title I can remember, that make me want to seek out other works by that writer.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:53 pm (UTC)
I find myself in the gateworld crew and, when I say this I'm not being egotistical, none of them are particularly "stellar" writers. I have asked a few for opinions on plot ideas and if something seems in character but I've never had any of them beta anything for me.

In fact, I think the only person I've asked to beta something for me in this fandom is you. I've got a friend who has never watched Atlantis who reads through and points things out to me and such and that helps - he's gotten to know the characters through what I write.

I'm bad in the sense that practically nothing of mine is beta-ed unless it's for someone else. I read through my stories when I write them but I still always miss things and it's when I read them after I've posted that I notice. Still, I go back and change it.

I know what my weaknesses are in writing and I try really hard when I'm writing to fix them but sometimes they just slip out so... yeah. But I am aware of the fact that I have issues with my writing, which is more than I can say for some people I've beta-ed for. I once beta read a story and had to practically rewrite the basic plot for them because it was just so all over the place, the timeline wonky and the spelling atrocious. It was awful. I've never done it for that person again because they posted the story with only a few minor spelling adjustments and left the rest as it was.

It ended up being a "ff.net" favourite. That's saying a lot.

*sigh*

Fandom, eh?
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 11:08 pm (UTC)
It ended up being a "ff.net" favourite. That's saying a lot.

I've definitely seen that happen quite a few times. *shakes head*
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 11:09 pm (UTC)
I just don't get it. Why do the frequenters there not appreciate good writing?? *shakes head*

It's disturbing.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 11:11 pm (UTC)
Yeah.

It makes one question why they should put actual effort into anything they write if practically anything is going to receive high praise, or at least lots of reviews.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 11:14 pm (UTC)
Exactly! Now don't get me wrong, I do actually talk to a lot of the authors (they're of the gateworld crew too) and they're lovely but... *sigh*

Someone once told me they didn't read my stories because they were far too much like the show and she read fan fiction to escape the fact that John and Teyla weren't together. I was like... "Fair enough but.. WTF?"

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 10:03 pm (UTC)
You make some really good points. I beta off and on for various people on my f-list, and cross fandoms. The only fandom I actually have someone beta for me personally, is Torchwood, and that is a recent development. I find it very difficult to find a beta I can work with, who can offer me the help I need. I use a beta for TW (and DW) primarily for brit-picking, b/c as much of an anglophile as I am, I do not live in Britain, and phrases that I commonly use are not always used in Britain. The beta I use, I chose randomly when I was writing a ficathon; she was listed as a beta reader and sounded like she was someone I could work with. Fortuitously, she is. She's already helped me massively with grammar, and has helped me with plot structure. And while I technically use someone else for my Fanfare fic, I sent her a copy of the chapter, b/c, as I told her, I trust her to tell me if something needs work, or if the world building just wasn't done well enough.

When I beta, I tend to focus on plot holes and inconsistencies. In part, this is b/c my own grammatical education was so poor, that I occasionally miss grammatical errors. But, I've found that working with my primary beta, has helped improve my grammar to the point where I'm more confident on that level now. But yeah. I enjoy beta'ing b/c it helps me give back to the fandom, especially since, until recently, my writing was very slowly produced.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 11:45 pm (UTC)
I'm willing to forgive minor grammatical mistakes, if the plot and consistency is top notch in a story. But if I see it's been betaed, and the plot and consistency and characterization (which, I tend to lump in with consistency) are awful, I quickly stop reading. I can't tell you how many fics I've stopped reading halfway through b/c everything and the kitchen sink were being throw into it and things just aren't making sense.

I think that is what disappointed me with Big Bang this year. On the one hand, I give all the participants credit, b/c writing at least 40K words is a super big achievement and I have a lot of respect for that. But some of the fics... I stopped reading a couple of them, and was extremely disappointed with at least one of them because I expected it to be more than it was, based on the number of words written and the plot description. I need to be able to draw a line through the plot, to show me where everything connects. If that doesn't work, I'm going to call the author on it.
Thursday, September 25th, 2008 12:10 am (UTC)
I know exactly what you mean! The one that was 130K+ was essentially a "how great are John and Rodney together?" fic, which was nice... but not for 130K words. I expected a plot, not a Mills & Boone romance.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:16 pm (UTC)
All good points. It's hard work to be a 'good' beta, which is why I'm selective about it. And it's also hard to take that step back from your fic when you send it off.

But yes, treat your beta readers well; I've discovered having one for plot holes/continuity and a second for over-all grammar and flow works best for me. But then I think I'm probably fortunate in that I've had a stable beta for so long (and have found someone who is very good at picking out those plot holes/continuity issues).
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:18 pm (UTC)
See, when I beta, I tend to work most with people who need instruction in basic grammar, because I'm good at explaining not just what's wrong but why it's wrong and how to make it better. And bad grammar bugs me so much that the chance to really rip something apart with red ink (okay, red pixels) can be really satisfying. But #4 is key--that's so important.

Also: [livejournal.com profile] synecdochic has a series of writing meta that's really good. She's got essays on all kinds of things from the structure of fiction in general to mechanics (mood, point of view, show-don't-tell) to characterization to reader expectations to the process of writing and the process of editing--they're great essays, easy to read and understand, and she doesn't fall into the trap of saying "you have to do it the way I do it." Lots of times when there's a big problem in someone's story and that requires a lot of work I can point them in the direction of one of her essays to explain why that's such a huge problem. Saves me a lot of time and effort having to reinvent the wheel.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:30 pm (UTC)
Lots of times when there's a big problem in someone's story and that requires a lot of work I can point them in the direction of one of her essays to explain why that's such a huge problem. Saves me a lot of time and effort having to reinvent the wheel.

Yes, this in particular can be very frustrating - trying to figure out how to instruct someone on how to fix their fic.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:42 pm (UTC)
Yeah. Because I've had stories where there was a major problem and the author was a n00b who knew nothing about writing and had never paid much attention to what she read besides "I like this" or "I don't like this" and so to explain what the problem was and why it was a problem would have taken more words than the story or chapter. But knowing that, would enable them to make their story 1000x better than it was at that moment.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:27 pm (UTC)
Thanks so much for writing this. :)
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 03:40 am (UTC)
I remember.

I started betaing because I figured it would be a way to improve the quality of the stories, particularly on the Ronon/Keller front, since the ship is rather new. I'm not the greatest writer, but I'm feel I'm pretty good at pointing out inconsistencies and recognizing areas where there writer needs to elaborate.

One person who I beta'd for recently told me that I "spoiled" her, because she liked my method. She wrote, "I find myself looking for someone who will offer suggestions and criticism as well as check my punctuation and grammar."

I thought, That's what you should have been looking for in a beta reader all along. Either way, it's cool she sees the difference now. You're supposed to want someone who is going to push you to be a better writer. If not, there's no point in writing at all.

I mean, yes, part of it is writing stories that are fun and enjoyable. But I personally want to read stories that stay with me, ones whose title I can remember, that make me want to seek out other works by that writer.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 09:53 pm (UTC)
I find myself in the gateworld crew and, when I say this I'm not being egotistical, none of them are particularly "stellar" writers. I have asked a few for opinions on plot ideas and if something seems in character but I've never had any of them beta anything for me.

In fact, I think the only person I've asked to beta something for me in this fandom is you. I've got a friend who has never watched Atlantis who reads through and points things out to me and such and that helps - he's gotten to know the characters through what I write.

I'm bad in the sense that practically nothing of mine is beta-ed unless it's for someone else. I read through my stories when I write them but I still always miss things and it's when I read them after I've posted that I notice. Still, I go back and change it.

I know what my weaknesses are in writing and I try really hard when I'm writing to fix them but sometimes they just slip out so... yeah. But I am aware of the fact that I have issues with my writing, which is more than I can say for some people I've beta-ed for. I once beta read a story and had to practically rewrite the basic plot for them because it was just so all over the place, the timeline wonky and the spelling atrocious. It was awful. I've never done it for that person again because they posted the story with only a few minor spelling adjustments and left the rest as it was.

It ended up being a "ff.net" favourite. That's saying a lot.

*sigh*

Fandom, eh?
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 11:08 pm (UTC)
It ended up being a "ff.net" favourite. That's saying a lot.

I've definitely seen that happen quite a few times. *shakes head*
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 11:09 pm (UTC)
I just don't get it. Why do the frequenters there not appreciate good writing?? *shakes head*

It's disturbing.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 11:11 pm (UTC)
Yeah.

It makes one question why they should put actual effort into anything they write if practically anything is going to receive high praise, or at least lots of reviews.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 11:14 pm (UTC)
Exactly! Now don't get me wrong, I do actually talk to a lot of the authors (they're of the gateworld crew too) and they're lovely but... *sigh*

Someone once told me they didn't read my stories because they were far too much like the show and she read fan fiction to escape the fact that John and Teyla weren't together. I was like... "Fair enough but.. WTF?"

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 10:03 pm (UTC)
You make some really good points. I beta off and on for various people on my f-list, and cross fandoms. The only fandom I actually have someone beta for me personally, is Torchwood, and that is a recent development. I find it very difficult to find a beta I can work with, who can offer me the help I need. I use a beta for TW (and DW) primarily for brit-picking, b/c as much of an anglophile as I am, I do not live in Britain, and phrases that I commonly use are not always used in Britain. The beta I use, I chose randomly when I was writing a ficathon; she was listed as a beta reader and sounded like she was someone I could work with. Fortuitously, she is. She's already helped me massively with grammar, and has helped me with plot structure. And while I technically use someone else for my Fanfare fic, I sent her a copy of the chapter, b/c, as I told her, I trust her to tell me if something needs work, or if the world building just wasn't done well enough.

When I beta, I tend to focus on plot holes and inconsistencies. In part, this is b/c my own grammatical education was so poor, that I occasionally miss grammatical errors. But, I've found that working with my primary beta, has helped improve my grammar to the point where I'm more confident on that level now. But yeah. I enjoy beta'ing b/c it helps me give back to the fandom, especially since, until recently, my writing was very slowly produced.
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 11:45 pm (UTC)
I'm willing to forgive minor grammatical mistakes, if the plot and consistency is top notch in a story. But if I see it's been betaed, and the plot and consistency and characterization (which, I tend to lump in with consistency) are awful, I quickly stop reading. I can't tell you how many fics I've stopped reading halfway through b/c everything and the kitchen sink were being throw into it and things just aren't making sense.

I think that is what disappointed me with Big Bang this year. On the one hand, I give all the participants credit, b/c writing at least 40K words is a super big achievement and I have a lot of respect for that. But some of the fics... I stopped reading a couple of them, and was extremely disappointed with at least one of them because I expected it to be more than it was, based on the number of words written and the plot description. I need to be able to draw a line through the plot, to show me where everything connects. If that doesn't work, I'm going to call the author on it.
Thursday, September 25th, 2008 12:10 am (UTC)
I know exactly what you mean! The one that was 130K+ was essentially a "how great are John and Rodney together?" fic, which was nice... but not for 130K words. I expected a plot, not a Mills & Boone romance.