May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45678 910
1112 13 14 1516 17
1819 2021 22 23 24
2526272829 3031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, January 27th, 2009 10:36 pm
"How could anyone love a stone in their shoe?"
~ The Stepmother, Ever After ~

*breathes*

It started with an author called Elizabeth Bear talking about writing the Other without being a dick. Unfortunately, someone pointed out a story of hers which features a magical negro who is 'tamed' by a white woman and stating that it was problematic.

It turned into a big argument about cultural appropriation: who has the right to write about non-whites, how our society perceives and stereotypes the Other (African, Asian, Indian, Oriental, Pacific Islander, Eskimo, Alien), how perfectly nice people can be racist without ever realising it, how it always comes back to the satisfaction and emotional catharsis of white people at the expense of the persons of colour trying to say "I am here, my pain is real, don't ignore what I have to say or dismiss it just because you don't want to hear that you put your foot wrong and might have to apologise."

I'm no good at talking about this stuff - I can't talk about a broader experience, I can only talk about my own experience.

One thing that's repeatedly come up is that white fans feel fandom is their safe space and their place to have fun. That to question the racial assumptions, cultural appropriations, and racist attitudes of fandom is to effectively deny white people their 'safe space', where they can happily squee and post fannishly and never have to question their choices or behaviours or feel guilty about the weight of history upon them regarding racist behaviours, a racist system, and how POC can't hide that they're POC.

And so I sit here and post these thoughts and try to broaden my perspectives and watch as the people who read this journal amble by without ever reading or commenting.

My f-list is primarily fannish. People who like my fic - whatever aspect that might be. People who once liked me. There are a handful of people who are both fannish and people of colour, but they're just that - a handful.

And so I watch the comments rack up on my fiction and wonder if I am the fly in the ointment of my f-list's f-lists.

Am I the crazy lady on the train?

Am I the stone in the shoe?

And if so, are the only options to wince and bear it or to throw the stone away?

Which do you choose?

Do you wince and bear these posts of mine and others like me? Or do you skip over them, safe in the knowledge that tomorrow, next week, next month, I/we/they might post something that you're actually interested in - something that's relevant to you, that doesn't challenge you and your way of looking at the world in any way?

Sometimes I wonder.
Tags:
Wednesday, January 28th, 2009 07:56 pm (UTC)
Sometimes I find it ironic that the same religion/faith provides people who question their Goodness with the reason for examining themselves while providing others with the excuse of blind, unthinking certainty that They Are On The Side Of The Angels.

Hear, hear!

It's really interesting how evangelical seems to mean something entirely different based on where it is from. It seems to be the nature that in the US it means rigid and firm by the book. While in my country the evangelicals are the ones who are openminded and loving and inclusive compared to the Catholics, performing gay marriage, having women priests, being openminded and inclusive etc. For us here (and maybe generally for the rest of the world?) evangelical usually means loving and liberal, while in the US it usually seems to mean hardcore that in comparison Catholics look progressive for a second.

Zhe world, it's odd sometimes.