June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Friday, March 31st, 2006 07:49 am
It's recently come to my notice that the manner in which 'native races' are portrayed on Stargate is, if not racist, then certainly strongly jingoistic.

This is going to focus on the broader perception of races and how they get portrayed in the show - mostly Atlantis, although SG-1 will be in there, too.

Basically, it seems that the native races of Pegasus are either technologically inept (primitive) or 'the bad guys'.

We have societies like the Athosians, who are still in the 'hunter-gatherer' stage of civilisation, who are on the side of the Atlantis expedition but primitive; and at the other end of the scale, we have societies like the Gennii, who are close to the 'information revolution' stage of civilisation, but are at best wary allies, and at worst, frank enemies.

Then there are the Satedans, who must have had a pretty technologically advanced civilisation before the Wraith took them out - Ronon's weaponry speaks to that - but who don't even get a mention on the 'we could pick over their bones and see if they developed something we haven't' scale. Hell, I don't think anyone's mentioned even asking Ronon if they can take apart his weapons to see how they tick.

Granted, Ronon's likely to look at them and say flatly, 'No,' but the man came from a world that nearly fought back against the Wraith! Just because he doesn't speak much doesn't mean he's a savage. He's probably no more of a savage than any man who comes home from his work, sits down in his lounge chair and can't be prevailed on for more than a grunt or a dozen before dinner, let alone bed.

The episode that's supposed to deal with Ronon's background will be interesting: if only because it took them about 30 episodes to even revisit Teyla's background with the Athosians, and they were relegated to a side plot, a funeral, and some very lovely singing by Rachel Luttrell that had almost no relevance to the plot.

The race issue is another thing that's slowly been coming upon me.

SG1 - Teal'c is the 'native guide' - black, primitive people.
SGA - Teyla is the 'native guide' - mixed race, primitive people.
SGA - Aiden is the 'yes, man' - black
SGA - Ronon is the 'grunt and muscle' - with a polynesian background (? I think - but even if not, the point with Teal'c, Teyla and Aiden still stands)

You know, I'm waiting for the episode where they come across an Asiatic civilisation that's either run like the Japanese samurai or full of Asian crime gangs.

It's a bit worrying, not that there are characters who are relegated to the background and they're non-white(other characters are background, too: Janet, Carson, Zelenka, etc), but that the non-white characters seem to be inevitably relegated to the background in the Stargate universe.

To some degree, I'm sure it's symptomatic of TV shows: white people want to watch white people. Still, I find it disturbing that the nominated 'leaders' of the primitive peoples - and therefore their representatives - are almost always non-white. (Plus, the leaders of the 'white people with civilisation' are evil if their cultures aren't.)

Finally, I'm curious about the fact that the 'jumper driver seat is on the left. Not all civilisations drive on the right-hand side of the road. It's like the assumption that people in the Northern Hemisphere have that birds fly south for the winter, and that things get warmer the further south you go.

Atlantis does not necessarily have to be in the northern hemisphere of its planet. I mean, it very well may be - I haven't studied the shots of the planet all that well. But, coming from the other half of the planet (where Christmas is in summer and we build our houses facing north for the best sun) I think it would be cool to have all the people from up north completely turned around by the fact that the sun's path lies northwards and not south, while the people from the southern hemisphere are all "what are you guys going on about?" While secretly snickering behind their hands.

The idea of a culture that influenced Earth (instead of American-Earth influencing it) is intriguing: but it would have been nice to see some of the standards turned upside down - perceptions changed and rearranged - to make people think.

And if you can sandwich some perception adjustment in between entertainment, I don't think that's entirely a bad thing.
Saturday, April 1st, 2006 12:36 am (UTC)
Full disclosure, I am not a huge proponent of mixing race and culture. They're linked, of course, but as an immigrant and traveler I know that race can at times have absolutely nothing to do with culture.

Oh, but what about the Wraith? The central premise of SGA is that these people, the heroes, are here to commit xenocide or die. There is, at this moment, no other alternative. Other than leaving, and then, hey, no show. When the first SciFi channel ads came out, that was premise.

Stick that in front of a backdrop of people debating if torture is okay if it catches terrorists, and Kolya is the least of our metaphorical worries.

I take it as a rightful conclusion to the actions in the show.
But it's the actions and attitudes you're pointing out, correct? Am I misunderstanding? I'm saying those writing choices are consistent with a, hm, humorous subversion. Absurd, even. And that subversion needs a stage that mirrors real life. (U.S. Congress is 87 percent white; 85 percent in the House and 96 percent in the Senate.) I mean, there are all kinds of other writing choices they could be making. What they settled on is that condescending American bias (compared to say, the amount of stuff we know about the Ancients in Atlantis, ironically) -- but I would be really, really disturbed if they were justifying it, which they are not.

I think a lot of people outside the U.S. underestimate how little general understanding there is of latent racism, historical precedent, and current policy. We don't talk about this. At all. What SGA is doing is taking a classic (white, male) comic book premise and putting in some really ugly, authentic actions. Even if it isn't deliberately subversive, if you play that in an American context? It's very Daily Show.