tielan: nyara, a tabby cat is resting on a modem and staring into the camera (cat01)
Sunday, February 25th, 2024 10:35 pm
Went to the Frocktails event, had heaps of fun. Better because this year I recognised a few more faces, and had a slightly less rushed weekend up there. Also, this time I wasn't on my period and bleeding out like a crazy person, so I was getting more sleep, was less anxious, the whole deal.

The dress was a Simplicity pattern, suitable for a stretch knit, and I did it in a magenta bamboo knit. With a lot of unpicking, because I read the pattern wrong, and the instructions were not the clearest:

Blue Mountains Frocktails 2024 Blue Mountains Frocktails 2024 Blue Mountains Frocktails 2024


I think the bodice may need to be one size larger, and I should prefer something that fakes hips on me (my hip-to-waist ratio is non-existent), but it worked and was pretty comfy wearing.

I did learn that weight weirdness is a function of perimenopause and I might need to grow accustomed to not fitting into anything for a few years. Not the news that one particularly wants to hear!

And in despite of my dissatisfaction with my current weight and body shape, I think I looked quite good in it.

Blue Mountains Frocktails 2024


extra things I did while up in the BMWhile up in the Blue Mountains, I also went to a High Tea at the Hydro Majestic hotel (very fancy, always nice but not exceptional, yes, I know, I'm a snob), and did a fantastic spa experience in the hotel that hosts the event. I did a remedial massage last year and the therapist was So Good and I really appreciated it. This year, I was still sore from the personal training session last week, so having a fuller spa experience (scrub, spa bath, remedial massage with attention to my problem spots) was awesome.

(I might need to do a session with the physio at some point, just to ease out the last stiffness? IDK. Just resting it helps, tbh.)


Again, I was staying at the hotel hosting the Frocktails, which made it really nice to just go up to my room at the end of the night, and watch the reports from the Matildas v. Uzbekistan game, which we won 3-0. I'd semi-kept-up with the game throughout the night - the social media accounts were great for that.

Matildas stuffThere wasn't much happening until late in the 2nd half - I think about 70s minutes in, and then they brought on an 'old Matilda' who'd last played for the national team in 2016, back before most Aussie footballers were anywhere on the international scene.

There were shots on shots on shots from the Aussie team. Some went wide, others were blocked by the keeper. But nine minutes into her substitution onto the field, Michelle Heyman was back on the scoreboard and infusing the game with a new sense of possibility!

Player shuffling happened in the wake of Sam Kerr's injury - well, it had to, didn't it? Our wings are solid, great in front of the goal, but apart from Sam we haven't really had a confident, aggressive '9' striker to take it straight through the centre and push that attack. It's not that Foord or Raso or Vine or Fowlere or any of the other icons from the WWC23 aren't great forwards, but you need someone with the confidence and aggression to press hard for the goal.

Also, in spite of the calls for "more new players", I suspect a '9 Forward' is something that you either have to be supremely confident to start off in (also: Kerr worked up to it - the woman has been playing in the national team since she was sixteen), or else have experience of doing. So an experienced forward was a good idea; someone who's played the game, knows her own worth, doesn't need to be eased into the team. That was Heyman last night. And good for her!

Any new players are going to have a rough time of it - we had one entirely new Matilda on the field, and while she was good, she didn't stand out. Didn't take on the players herself, but passed a lot. Good player, but needs polish. That's not me blaming her, btw. It must be really difficult to join the Matilda as a new cap right now, particularly given the Tillies have become such an icon in the last year. Heck, I think it's difficult to play on the team as a 'not one of the iconic players' - one of the fifteen or so "familiar names" on the team. Previously? Nobody really minded/cared/worried. Now? Now it's huge. There's national expectation and hopes riding on it. And always the possibility that if you flub it as a newbie, there'll be arseholes calling for your head on social media. *grimace*

--

Taylor Swift is in town - both metaphorically "in town" and actually in Sydney. There was some consternation among Americans watching the drone footage of the concert at the MCG (Melbourne Cricket Ground): where does everyone park? Out of all the questions anyone would have asked about the MCG, I do not think any of us were expecting THAT.

public transport and public eventsMost of our big sporting stadiums have a lot of public transport options around them. As in, LOTS. Train lines, tram lines, light rail, bus services. Parking is marginal (maybe a hundred spaces, most of them requiring disability passes) at best, if you are able-bodied, then get thee to a public transport system! They were designed like this, and if they weren't, then the cities have redesigned them to be part of the PT system. Plus events often have "event buses" that run along major road thoroughfares through the city and stop at various places to take on event-goers, bussing them straight in to the stadium for the event, and bussing them back out along the thoroughfares at the end.

Does it take a little longer than hopping in your car and driving home? Yes. But also, you're not creating extra congestion around the event, and there's usually a good feeling after an event that makes the trip enjoyable.

Incidentally, public transport in Australia is not a hub for "antisocial behaviour" the way it is perceived to be in America, particularly not event-centric public transport. Try groping someone in a crowded carriage of post-event people and you're likely to end up targeted by any number of people who would have been polite to you so long as you were polite to everyone else. In Australia, once your courtesy is off the table, so is ours. And we're a bit of a fighty sort of people.


--

I have also endured entirely too many people sneering at Taylor Swift in Australia.

in which I rant mightilyLike I am not even a Swiftie, but I have respect for what she's achieved and is achieving, even if it is not my bag, baby. And no, she's not my hero, but she's an icon to a lot of other women - not all (or even most) of whom are stupid and thoughtless and brainless and dumb sluts. And no, nobody has actually SAID they're those things, but do you really think I can't hear what you're thinking when you're telegraphing it that fucking noisily?

Including the arsehat who tried to set up Taylor Swift vs the Matildas in one of the FB community groups surrounding the Matildas. He got rightly put in his place. Seriously, you don't like her? Fine. You don't like the attention she's receiving? Fine. You have an inferiority complex about what she's done and is doing? Great. KEEP IT TO YOUR FUCKING SELF. NOBODY NEEDS TO SEE YOUR INSECURITY HANGING OUT LIKE VARSITY PENISES FLAILING IN THE WIND OUT THEIR BUDDY'S CAR WINDOW.

Can we not be "pick me" girls? Can we not do the "well, we're not like all the other girls" schtick that is really just about making ourselves feel better about our choices as though other people's choices somehow invalidate our own?

We are not better because we prefer Halestorm and P!nk and Alanis Morisette, or climb mountains, kick balls, and hit pucks into goals, or shoot traitors down with six minutes before detonation.

Be better because being a decent person is better, and liking your things without putting down other people's things is better, and recognising that other people make different choices can be a thing, too. And yeah, we might make judgements on what they would be if only they were more enlightened ("like us") but also, they might be just as enlightened and still like Tay-Tay. My God, the fucking ANGST of it all.


tl;dr: I had a great weekend, even if some people (mostly on the internet but a few in meatspace) are being idiots.
tielan: Maria coughing "testosterone!" (SJ - testosterone)
Sunday, May 2nd, 2021 07:17 pm
I saw one of those "High Maintenance" memes, where all the list of things are beauty-and-fashion oriented of the kind which most women are fed that they need to do/be to be considered attractive and feminine and interesting.

We can argue about the expectations of society on women until the cows come home, and also whether or not women should accept those expectations (my answer is: "no, women shouldn't, but being able to circumvent or subvert those expectations in any significant way tends to be really exhausting and puts you out on a limb if you don't happen to have really good support networks that accept you for who and what you are - and most women do not have that, even vaguely"), but the point of this is that I got riled and wrote up a post about 'high maintenance men'.

--

high maintenance men: TW for mention of DV happenings in Australian news )

--

ps. I love you guys, and I'm delighted for those of you who are not in relationships with high-maintenance men, BUT this post is not your invitation to tell me how your man isn't high maintenance and why, also not somewhere to post why it's good to be a lesbian. I'm happy to accept that these categories don't fit everyone, but the people this message is aimed at are not actually on DW. I wrote this to get it out somewhere.
Tags:
tielan: (don't mess with)
Friday, March 19th, 2021 09:51 pm
politics and religion

Some of these are pretty old, just set down for linkage.

back to January, the Georgia election, and the riots )

--

a little more timeless; all kinds of bits and pieces )

--

Women have had a rough few weeks in Australian politics.

TW: sexual assault, intimate partner violence, power and religion and scandal )

Evangelicalism is certainly having a reckoning right now. I just wish I could believe that Evangelicals would come out a little more shaken in their beliefs. Not likely, alas.

These next two articles are written by a woman I interact with regularly on FB: Australian, Christian, local. She's a minister in the Baptist church (conference?) of Australia (very different to the SBC) and vocal on women's issues, feminism (although she doesn't call it that), and evangelicalism (the Australian kind).

the church and sexuality )

...anyway. That was a links dump and a half. What a week. What a week to be an Australian woman - and specifically a woman of Asian descent living in a western country.

I think the terrifying thing is that the US at least has leadership who seems to be willing to move in the direction of doing the right thing.

Australia does not, and although we seem easygoing, we are overall a very conservative culture beneath our larrikinism.
tielan: ant in a line diverges because: bookstore (books - shiny)
Thursday, June 22nd, 2017 10:41 pm
NPR: Why Honeybees Are The Wrong Problem To Solve

From what I understand, the problem is less that 'without bees we won't be able to pollinate anything' and more 'the way we agribusiness is a problem - and the way we use bees in agribusiness is part of that problem'.

--

NPR: The Astrobiology Of The Anthropocene (2016)

Basically, like the Jurassic, Triassic, and other '-cene' eras, we're now in the Anthropocene. A new way of looking at things.

--

The Establishment: Adoption Is A Feminist Issue (But Not For The Reasons You Think)

Ties in with abortion and childbearing, and (I think) points out the issue that if women weren't crowded into a place where they have no economic choices/advantages, then both adoption and abortion rates would drop.

Which is pretty much what this article I linked to (from a Christian minister in Sydney) points out - that having children economically disadvantages women, and if we as a society (or culture, or community) are not going to help a woman bear the burden of children, then even the ones who eventually want children are going to abort if they become pregnant at an inconvenient time.

--

The Atlantic: The Cheapest Generation

What do you do when an entire generation of society largely don't want or can't afford the products you're selling? What does that do to the model of economic growth?

--

Sydney Morning Herald: Three Women Who Regret Motherhood

Earlier this week, I asked if there was any socially acceptable way for a woman to indicate she regretted having children. The kick for that question was this article.

I think the most helpful thing I got was [personal profile] havocthecat saying that perhaps there needs to be some kind of 'mourning ceremony' for all the things that are going to be lost in having a child. A baby shower is supposed to be the joyful, hopeful, encouraging thing, but we don't talk about the negative side of changes to a woman's status when she becomes a mother.

--

Racked: The Politics of Pockets (2016)

How and why women's clothing has no pockets.

--

The New Yorker: China's Mistress Dispellers

The people who are hired to get rid of China's mistresses - chase them off, buy them out - whatever works. And the culture and sociology and reasoning behind the scenes of such a business, as well as an insight into a brief history of Chinese marriage.

--

The New Yorker: Power To The People (2015)

An article about solar power and the part that utility companies - and regulation - may have to play in that; to their advantage, but in the face of the old model. (Man, how does that sound familiar.)

There was an interesting article that popped up as a result of this (or which popped this up as a result) about solar power in Africa - that's a 2017 article, about startups in Africa selling cheap power to sub-Saharan Africans, the advantages, disadvantages, and moral questions. I don't know where that article is, though - I thought I saved it, but maybe not.

--

Modern Maker's Retreat: A New Perspective on Modern Quilting

The last few years have seen arguments over what defines modern quilting, and this woman has an interesting perspective on it all (and one which I've lightly touched on in quilting blogging). Quilting used to be a thrift task - done because there were scraps that needed to be used rather than wasted. Now, it's a creative work of art - done for the joy of it, and by people who have the resources to spend on function-specific tools and fabric. She thinks that's the difference between 'traditional' and 'modern' quilting for her. I can't entirely agree; I think colour and fabric and style comes into play as well.
tielan: (don't make me shoot you)
Friday, February 17th, 2017 05:13 pm
"It’s not about adding diversity for the sake of diversity, it’s about subtracting homogeneity for the sake of realism."
― Mary Robinette Kowal

--

Yonic: resembling of vulva/labia/vagina

Yonic, from from sanskrit word Yoni

--

In answer to a guy sarcastically saying 'So I can never talk to a woman again?' when someone reprimands them for sexist thinking: "If you automatically think that you are more qualified to speak about a topic than a woman, then yeah, you should probably keep your trap shut when women start speaking."
tielan: Leia, RotJ, concerned (SW - Leia concern)
Tuesday, May 24th, 2016 04:12 pm
Sign-ups close on Saturday, May 28, at approximately 8PM EDT.

Pinch-hit signups will remain open.

Remix Treats sign-ups are now open.

If you are not participating in the main remix but would like treats, we'd also like to encourage you to sign up as a pinch-hitter (however, you are not obligated to claim a pinch-hit).
Tags:
tielan: (AVG - maria)
Thursday, July 30th, 2015 12:54 pm
Where's My Cut: On Unpaid Emotional Labor

The MetaFilter discussion

starnise's post
elf's post
siderea's post

And this was prompted by another friend's discussion about 'one-sided relationships in fandom', where a friend will happily inundate you with something ze loves (and you don't) for 3 hours, and then vanishes the instant you start talking about something you love and ze doesn't.

Yes, I've been there.

Emotional labour.

I don't get very meta on LJ anymore; my interests are primarily fannish. But this struck a chord for me in the situation I'm in right now, in the situations of my friends that I'm watching unfold before me.
Tags:
tielan: (PacRim - Mako2)
Friday, July 4th, 2014 08:50 am
Well, that was fun.

Five minutes talking Star Wars characterisation in the originals vs the prequels, with two guys, one of whom looked at the other guy for the entirety of my argument that the prequels had bad characterisation and that it wasn't entirely due to the 'protocols and structures and formality of the Old Republic'.

And then at the end I get dismissed as a "Star Wars freak" because I know the names of the Imperial officers in the original movies and was using them as an argument to say that the issue with the lack of character in the prequels is not the fact that they're in a formal structure - the Old Republic, the Senate, the Jedi Council.

Protocols, structures, and formality doesn't mean you erase all personality from characters. People still react with their personality when there are limits laid upon them. We can't help it. We're frigging human. (Yes, even the aliens depicted on our screens. Unless they're the bad guys, in which case they're depicted as incomprehensibly alien.)

I can see my future, and there is much headdesking that will be done in the next week. There's almost certainly going to be A Disussion Of Feminism on Wednesday at the Sydney Quilt Show (where the gay guy representing 'the future of modern quilting' is a major advertising point) probably with a bunch of women who simply won't get it. Or don't want to.
tielan: (AVG - maria)
Wednesday, April 2nd, 2014 11:10 am
22nd Jan- why should we all love Maria Hill? requested by [personal profile] justhuman

Maria Hill is the character in the MCU who does her job.

That's it. She does her job. )



Note: this was started back in January and modified a bunch of times. Given that Maria's in Cap2 (which I'm going to see tomorrow) and is apparently pretty awesome, it may not be accurate anymore, and even so, it was cobbled together from a bunch of reactions to Maria all over Tumblr, the intarwebs, and from hardcore comics fans.
tielan: (Default)
Wednesday, April 24th, 2013 04:33 pm
On erasure of female characters in fanfic.

In conclusion: there are no bad female characters, only fans who are bad about female characters.

Often, those fans are us, too.
Tags:
tielan: (AVG - Natasha)
Sunday, March 10th, 2013 01:05 pm
The girls swept the prelims.

I mean, THE GIRLS SWEPT THE PRELIMS.

Molly Hooper in Sherlock.
Natasha Romanoff in Avengers.
Joan Watson in Elementary. (Okay, so that's not a surprise.)

I am o.O but also DELIGHTED to see this.
tielan: (Default)
Saturday, July 23rd, 2011 01:53 pm
It's a nice change to watch a show that's focused on the friendship between two women.

Because Stargate, Stargate Atlantis, Sanctuary, Fringe, Merlin, H50, NCIS, and Castle all have their enjoyable points, but they tend to fail quite miserably on the female friendship front - as do their fandoms.

And, you know, I like females, and female characters, and female characters being strong and capable and intelligent and funny, and more than one female character being strong and capable and intelligent and funny in the same show at the same time.

But I'm not a huge femslasher. I just want more female characters in my shows, interacting with each other, and being awesome.
tielan: (don't make me shoot you)
Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 09:02 am
A show that isn't utilising all its existing female characters is not going to utilise new female characters any better than it does the existing ones.

The problem is very rarely the lack of existing strong female characters but the lack of knowledge of what to do with them - or, specifically, with more than one of them.

And because the problem is that the (white, male) writers don't know what to do with more than one woman (especially when the second female character isn't white), this problem is never, ever solved by throwing more female characters into the mix.

eta: Yes, shows need more female characters, without a doubt! However. I've never yet seen a show that could do better with more female characters when it was doing not-so-well with less.

And yes, Sanctuary does fine with one female character. Most modern shows do right by at least one of their female characters. It's when you have more than one that problems crop up. The second female's skills tend to be ignored or dismissed, her characterisation is underdeveloped or tossed every which way according to convenience, and/or she's turned into a stereotype and never rounded out.
Tags:
tielan: (don't make me shoot you)
Wednesday, March 9th, 2011 08:11 am
It's actually 30 days, but I condensed it down into 10 days, and then typed it all up this morning while waiting for someone to bring around the work unit I'll be working on.

My only regret is that I don't have time to put together picspams of each of the characters in question.

10 days of questions condensed into 1 day )

Happy Women's Appreciation Day, f-list!
tielan: (don't make me shoot you)
Tuesday, January 4th, 2011 08:02 am
[livejournal.com profile] halfamoon

From the 1st Feb to the 14th Feb every year, the community [livejournal.com profile] halfamoon runs a post-a-thon for the female characters that fandom loves.

Fic, art, icons, graphics, picspams, meta, vids - any fannish endeavour about the women in question is welcomed and acceptable for posting there, to share your love of awesome female characters.

Het or Femmeslash is fine, as is Gen, but the focus should be on the female characters!

I always want to see more about Teyla Emmagan (SGA), Guinevere (Merlin), Ziva David (NCIS), and now Kate Freelander (Sanctuary) as well as their female colleagues. I'm going to try to write at least one fic about each in the coming month for this challenge, maybe put together some icons, and possibly collate an Awesome Picspam like I did last year for Teyla.

I'm not even sure if they're running it this year, but the last couple of years, I've been caught on the back foot and had to scramble to put something together. So I'm getting ready early this year!
tielan: (Default)
Wednesday, October 20th, 2010 07:33 am
Here's a novel thought:

The reason most female characters can't carry their own story is because the canon they are in is usually not about them.

So of course the female character(s) of most canons can't carry her own story, because the writers of canon do not write about her as though she's a person with her own desires, thoughts, goals, and suchlike that just happen to intersect with the male character(s), but as though she's an appendage to the male character(s) - there for his convenience, use, and dismissal/destruction when his story requires it.
Tags:
tielan: (go boom)
Wednesday, October 13th, 2010 09:21 am
Lately overheard in fandom:

OVERTHINKINGIT: Tell me, what do you do with female characters?
FAN 1: Burn them!
OVERTHINKINGIT: And what do you burn apart from women?
FAN 1: More women.
FAN 2: Tropes.
OVERTHINKINGIT: Good, now why are female characters worthless?
FAN 2: Because...they're tropes?
OVERTHINKINGIT: So, how do you tell if a female character is a trope?
FAN 1: She fits into your handy female character flowchart with terms that were totes not stolen from TV tropes.
OVERTHINKINGIT: Ah, but now, can you not also have male characters who are tropes?
FAN 1: Oh...um...yeah, I guess.
OVERTHINKINGIT: Are all tropes bad?
FAN 2: When they apply to female characters!
OVERTHINKINGIT: What else is bad?
FAN 1: Het fic.
FAN 2: People who complain about race representation.
FAN 3: Republicans.
FAN 1: Major characters who aren't white or male and who don't appropriately defer to the white males.
FAN 2: People who write het fic.
FAN 3: Female characters.
OVERTHINKINGIT: Exactly! So, logically...
FAN 2: If she's a female character...then...SHE'S A TROPE!
Dear Overthinking It,

Certainly, you've put together a useful flowchart for identifying tropes. However, not all tropes are bad, and the fact that a character matches a trope does not make them any less "real", "strong", "worthwhile", or "interesting".

You might like to reconsider reducing females - real or fictional - to a single most notable aspect.

not exactly encouraged by your reductionism,
T.

tl;dr version

OVERTHINKINGIT: If your female character fits any trope at all, she's not a "strong female character."
FANDOM: Let's take her out the back and beat the shit out of her!
Tags:
tielan: (go boom)
Tuesday, September 21st, 2010 01:26 pm
NH Summer brings out the Big Bangs - the massive efforts that are always due within days of each other. Then the NH autumn brings out a slew of small ficathons. Then it's winter and there's solstice, yuletide, and (the named and unashamed) Christmas ficathons.

In the last couple of years, I've kind of realised that I join ficathons because I don't get the kinds of fics I want to read any other way. And even then, I don't always get the fics I want to read.

What do I want to read in my fanfic? Action/adventure fics with a male/female relationship, and where the female character is not only permitted to be awesome but actively encouraged to be. And, frankly, that's rather rare, in any of my fandoms. Even the writers who like the female characters tend to focus on the male ones. And I don't want to be thrown a bone by the slashers when they deign to include my favourite female characters; I want something where my favourite female character is awesome and happens to be attractive to the guy who makes up the other half of my pairing preference.

Actually, I think that what I really want is a genderswapped heroic narrative trope: where the girl solves all the problems, gets involved in all the action, and gets the guy into the bargain!

There don't seem to be too many of those around...
Tags:
tielan: (race)
Saturday, August 7th, 2010 03:06 pm
An anti-rape campaign that focuses on what men can do to prevent rape instead of focusing on what women can do to keep from being raped!

My Strength Is Not For Hurting


Plus, wow, representation of visual minorities. WIN.